So there we are, staring at the decanter and waiting for the half-hour to pass us by. It gave us an opportunity to discuss the cigar that would match a wine of this caliber. It came down to two, the Padron 1964 Anniversary  Diplomatico (7 inches long with a ring gauge of 50) and the J.L. SALAZAR y HERMANOS Reserva Especial Churchill (7 1/4 inches long with a ring gauge of 52). Both are handmade with habano tobacco from Nicaragua, are box-pressed and have received very good reviews.

We lit up the cigars and cut a deal that I get the first half of the J.L. Salazar y Hermanos and he gets the first half of the Padron 1964 Anniversary cigar. I believe that the cigar scissor was invented for just that purpose. To cut the top part of the cigar that has saliva after someone else smoked it when passing a cigar from one smoker to another. Sure you lose a good half-an-inch from the cigar, but it allows you to smoke a cigar that was half-smoked. Remember that the purpose is to match wines with cigars.

Both the Padron and the J.L. Salazar started with a mouth full of rich smoke, the Padron 1964 Anniversary was a little milder while the J.L. Salazar was more full-bodied. The taste of both cigars was somewhat comparable, the J.L. Salazar having more of a floral touch and the Padron having more cream. Both smoked well and evenly. About one-quarter inch down, the iPhone alarm went off. It’s time for wine!

Consejo De La Alta Cata De Consejero 2001 has received rave reviews. Wine Enthusiast Magazine awarded 91 points to this Rioja wine. Wine Spectator gave it 89 points, with a stellar review. But the true test is what we think (because we are drinking it) and how it pairs with our cigars.

Swirling it around the glass, you can see the wine does not have the tension that it had when we first poured it into the decanter. The aromas have also loosed up a bit. They are still intense but now show more elegance. At first taste, it has smooth blackberries, a little blueberry, sweet plums, light touches of fig and an earthy background that is hard to identify. It felt firm and silky, completely complementing the cigars. I started to detect sweet cured tobacco and coffee in this complex wine. The Rioja wine continued to get smoother, meaning that we obviously did not let it air enough. Good thing that we waited and drank slowly. After a few more minutes, we refilled our glasses. 

Glass two and we were both eager to exchange cigars in order to compare our notes, but we weren’t half-way through. The wine started showing some toasty notes that blended wonderfully with the cigars. The floral notes of the JL Salazar y Hermanos accented the dark berries in the wine. The Padron 1964 Anniversary, on the other hand, started showing mouth-covering cream that went well with the wine’s coffee notes. It was clear that the characteristics of this special red wine meshed well with those of the cigars.

Finally switching time came. I generally enjoy the last half of the cigar more than the first half, but only if it is a truly good cigar. If the tobacco was not properly fermented and cured, then the opposite applies. In this case, there was nothing to worry about and I eagerly waited for the trade. I started smoking the Padron and my buddy the J.L. Salazar. We compared notes and while the Padron was creamy with light sweet notes, the J.L. Salazar had opened up a little more to reveal chocolate notes. The Padron was medium-bodied at this point, as compared to the full-bodied J.L. Salazar. Maybe it was the extra quarter inch of the JL Salazar over the Padron. There was something in the Padron that I picked up but could not identify. It was a blend of cocoa, coffee and cream that made it hard to put the cigar down. The Salazar had also developed a sweet chocolate, flower and earthy taste that also grabbed you. The Cata De Consejero’s smooth and intense taste added to the enjoyment.

We were almost out of wine and the cigars were reaching the nub. The extra quarter inch of the Salazar was important now. The Padron’s taste did not intensify during the last two inches, while the Salazar’s taste did. Both were delicious and kept us smoking them until we can no longer hold them. Comparing notes, we decided that both cigars had many similar characteristics. Among the differences, the Padron had a creaminess that was missing in the Salazar. On the other hand the Padron was lacking the Salazar’s floral and chocolaty taste that intensified as the cigar got smaller.

We finally drank the last of the wine and both agreed that we could not have had a better combination. Absolutely beautifully. It’s too bad that so few bottles of this Rioja wine were produced. If I knew the wine’s match with the cigars would be so wonderful, I would have saved it for a special occasion.